A proposal in the NEAR governance forum would cut the maximum annual issuance from 2.5 to 1.6 percent over 24 months, pressing the staking yield down from 5.4 to around 3.5 percent. The price loses 5.65 percent on October 3, for a different reason.
Which topics should we dive deeper into?
Select what genuinely interests you. Your picks feed directly into our editorial planning.
Crypto news that's actually worth your time.
Weekly. 60 seconds. Carefully curated by our editors: no hype, no promo flood, no spam.
A proposal has been sitting in NEAR's governance forum since September 30, 2026 that would permanently shrink the reward for staking: the maximum annual issuance is to fall from 2.5 to 1.6 percent, spread over 24 months. For you as a holder of NEAR that is the more important news of the weekend, even if the price is giving way right now for a different reason. According to market data from CoinGecko, NEAR costs $4.68 on October 3, down 5.65 percent within a day.
The connection is less direct than it looks. The issuance cut is a proposal that has not yet been voted on, and it would press the yield down only in small steps across two years. The daily loss belongs instead to a broad decline across the whole market, and to a month in which NEAR had climbed by almost 148 percent. Together, the two decide whether staking NEAR still pays for you.
The NEAR Issuance Proposal in Full
The proposal was tabled by Sal Ternullo, managing director of Svrn AI, on September 30, 2026, under the title "NEAR Governance Discussion: Reducing Issuance to 1.6%, and the Path to a Fixed Supply". It is a basis for discussion, and no parameter has been settled. The text names a clear figure: the maximum annual issuance, meaning the ceiling for newly created NEAR, is to fall from today's 2.5 percent to 1.6 percent.
Issuance describes the quantity of tokens a network creates anew and pays out to the validators that produce blocks. At NEAR the protocol distributes those new tokens by a fixed key: 90 percent go to the stakers, 10 percent into the network treasury. That key stays untouched under the proposal. What changes is only the total quantity that comes into existence at all.
It would not be the first cut of this kind. NEAR has already halved the ceiling once, from 5 percent to today's 2.5 percent. In the author's presentation the new proposal is a phase 1 on a longer road, at the end of which a fixed total supply is meant to stand. What exactly would happen in later phases is something the paper does not pin down.
From 2.5 to 1.6 Percent: How the Cut Works Over 24 Months
The pace is what decides the effect. The proposal sets no cut-off date on which issuance jumps from one value to the other. Instead the rate is to fall in small steps per epoch, over 24 months in total. An epoch at NEAR is the accounting period after which the protocol distributes rewards and determines the validator set afresh; it lasts around twelve hours.
This design has a practical reason. An abrupt cut would upend the arithmetic of every validator in a single day, and smaller operators whose income sits just above their server costs could drop out. A path spread over two years leaves them time to adjust fees and costs.
For you that means there is no date on which your yield collapses. There is a direction that, from the resolution onwards, bites a little harder with every distribution. Anyone who records their staking income month by month will see the change across quarters rather than days.
What the Cut Means in Token Terms
The proposal names two figures for that. At today's rate of 2.5 percent, around 89,500 new NEAR arrive every day. Over a year that comes to roughly 32.7 million tokens. And across a period of six years the downward path would avoid some 66 million NEAR that would otherwise have been created. Measured against the circulating supply of around 1.31 billion NEAR, that equals a good 5 percent.
Staking Yield From 5.4 to 3.5 Percent: What Delegators Lose
The number that counts for investors is in the paper as well. The staking yield, reported in the network as an annual return, stands at around 5.4 percent today. Once implemented in full it would be about 3.5 percent. That is 1.9 percentage points less, a good third of today's return.
The proposal works the example through itself: anyone delegating 1,000 NEAR holds about 21 NEAR fewer after two years than under today's rules. At the October 3 price that is just under $98. The figure looks small, and that is precisely where the proposers' argument lies: the yield given up is manageable, while the effect on the token supply is lasting.
Delegation means that you do not hand over your tokens. You assign them to a validator, which produces blocks with them. You remain the owner, and the validator keeps part of the reward as a fee. That fee is the point at which the cut hits you harder or more softly: where a validator already takes a high share, even less survives from a smaller gross reward. A look at our overview of staking providers is therefore worth taking before the resolution rather than after it.
89,500 NEAR a Day: The Dilution for Holders Who Do Not Stake
Anyone holding NEAR without staking receives nothing from the issuance and carries it all the same. This effect is called dilution: the total supply grows, your share of it shrinks, even if the number of tokens in your wallet stays the same. At 89,500 new NEAR a day, ownership shifts continuously from the passive holders to those who delegate.
The proposal names this point explicitly as a justification. High issuance, it argues, is a redistribution at the expense of those who do not stake, and the larger the network grows, the harder that is to justify. For you one simple consequence follows: if your NEAR sit unused on an exchange or in a wallet, you lose more relative share today than you would after a cut. The issuance cut therefore shrinks the yield of the stakers and the disadvantage of the non-stakers alike.
That explains why such a proposal meets different interests inside the same network. A delegator with a large holding loses running income. A holder who does not delegate, for tax or practical reasons, gains. In the end a vote of those entitled to vote settles this conflict of interest, and no decision by the core team does.
House of Stake: Who Votes on the Issuance Cut
House of Stake is NEAR's governance system, in which holders of voting rights decide on motions. The proposal is to be submitted there as a complete motion for phase 1; the forum post of September 30 says that will happen "next week". No fixed voting date has therefore been published, and the outcome is open as well.
That sequence matters for placing the news. The discussion runs in the forum first, and on this post it has already gathered a fair number of replies. Only afterwards does the formal vote follow. What exists today is a reasoned motion with concrete figures, and not a settled change to the protocol parameters.
For your own watching, that means the date to look at is the submission of the phase 1 motion at House of Stake. Only with it does it become clear which wording is actually being voted on, and whether the 1.6 percent and the 24 months survive the discussion unchanged.
The Reasoning: An Oversubscribed Validator Set and Revenue From Intents
High issuance serves a purpose in young networks: the premium pays operators for providing hardware in the first place. The proposal argues that NEAR has this build-up phase behind it. The validator set, it says, is oversubscribed, so there are more applicants than places. When operators are queuing, the network does not have to lure them in with high rewards.
As a second argument the text names growing revenue from NEAR Intents, the network's own system for cross-chain swaps. That revenue flows into buybacks of NEAR on the open market. Where real proceeds create demand, the logic runs, fewer newly created tokens are needed to finance the network.
Both justifications stand and fall with the reliability of that revenue. That Intents is no sure thing became clear on October 1: after an exploit the system halted withdrawals, as cryptoticker.io reported that day. A justification built on running proceeds is therefore only as strong as the operation that generates them. You can read the motion in NEAR's governance forum, and Crypto Briefing has published a summary of the core figures.
The October 3 Price Drop and the State of the Broader Market
The proposal does not explain the daily loss. According to market data from CoinGecko, NEAR loses 5.65 percent on October 3 to $4.68, and the decline does not stand alone: Bitcoin gives up 1.93 percent the same day, Ether 2.65 percent, Dogecoin 4.85 percent, Cardano 4.58 percent and Stellar 4.80 percent. NEAR falls harder than the large names, yet in the same direction as the broad market.
The second part of the explanation lies in the month before. On the same data NEAR stands around 148 percent above its level of 30 days ago, while over a week it is 3.66 percent down. After a move of that size, profit taking is the normal case, and the name that has risen the most usually gives way the most clearly in a weak market phase. From its all-time high of $20.44 in January 2022, NEAR remains 77.1 percent away.
Whether the announced cut to the staking yield already plays a role in the price cannot be derived from the data; there is no official reason given for the daily loss. As an assessment one can say this: a yield falling from 5.4 to 3.5 percent makes delegating less attractive for pure yield seekers, while for holders it lowers the dilution of their share. Which of the two effects prevails will only show after the resolution, in how the staked amount develops.
Fixed Supply as a Distant Goal: What Phase 1 Leaves Open
Alongside the cut, the title of the motion names a "Path to a Fixed Supply", a road to a fixed total supply. That formulation describes a direction, not a resolution. What stands for a vote is phase 1 with the 1.6 percent, and not a ceiling on the model of Bitcoin's 21 million.
The difference matters considerably for any assessment. A fixed total supply would mean that at some point no new tokens come into existence and the validators have to be paid from transaction fees and other proceeds alone. Whether NEAR's fees would ever be enough for that is an open question the motion does not answer.
For you that means treating the 1.6 percent as the thing being decided, and the fixed total supply as a declaration of intent. Anyone arguing today for NEAR with a Bitcoin-like promise of scarcity is anticipating a step the stakers have not yet taken.
Staking Providers and Custody: What to Check as an Investor in Germany
No pressure to act follows from this news, but there is a handful of things that are easier to settle now than after the resolution.
Validator Fee and Choice of Provider
The smaller the gross reward, the more weight your validator's fee carries. Check which share your provider retains and whether it may change the terms unilaterally. The spread between providers is considerable here. The difference between delegating yourself from a wallet and a staking product from an exchange also matters: in the second case you hold a claim against a company rather than the tokens themselves.
Buying Route, Custody and Tax
If you want to buy NEAR, make sure the provider is authorised in the EU under the MiCA regulation; an authorisation is no seal of quality, but it governs duties and routes of complaint. Which houses come into question for the German market is set out in our overview of regulated crypto exchanges.
On tax, staking follows a different logic from a pure price gain: rewards accrue to you continuously and are to be recorded as other income in the year they arrive, while the one-year holding period applies to the sale of the tokens themselves. Anyone who delegates therefore needs a clean record of every distribution with its date and price. The legal position on crypto income is in motion, and patchy documentation can hardly be made good later. For the running record there are portfolio trackers with tax reporting; placing your individual case belongs with a tax adviser.
NEAR Issuance Cut: The Key Points for Your Decision
- Look up your validator's yield. Note the gross yield and the fee your provider retains, and work both down to the future 3.5 percent. Where the fee is high, your position loses disproportionately. The terms of the providers are in our comparison of staking platforms.
- Wait for the submission at House of Stake. Only with the formal phase 1 motion is the wording fixed that will be voted on. Until then the cut is a reasoned proposal, and reshuffling on the basis of a draft is a bet on the outcome. If you want to switch provider in the process, check the authorisation via our overview of crypto exchanges.
- Set up the record of distributions. Hold on to every staking reward with its date and price while the yield still stands at 5.4 percent and the inflows are correspondingly numerous. The tax tools and portfolio trackers are there for that.
(As of October 3, 2026. This article is not investment advice. Prices and fee structures change; check the terms with the provider before you buy.)
Frequently asked questions about the NEAR issuance cut
Transparency note: This article was produced with the assistance of artificial intelligence and reviewed by our editorial team before publication. All figures and claims were checked against the primary sources linked in the text. The feature image was generated with AI.
- Cardano Vote on the 75 ADA Minimum Fee Stands at 34 Percent: What ADA Delegators Need to Know Before October 11
- NEAR keeps 2.5 percent emission instead of 1.6: what you can do about the staking yield
- NEAR Protocol explained: how sharding and 2.5 percent staking work
- Sushi Staking Yield: What the 3 September Cut to xSUSHI Buybacks Means for You
- Top 4 Cryptocurrency Staking Pools: A-Z Guide
NEAR Staking ETP Passes $100 Million: What to Check on Yield, Brokerage Account and Holding Period
The Bitwise NEAR staking ETP has crossed $100 million in assets under management while NEAR climbs to $4.99. Our own retrieval of the issuer's figures shows the price made the jump, not the inflows.
2.1 to 2.7 percent a year from Cardano staking: 170 ADA in pool costs sets the range
Cardano staking pays 2.74 percent a year gross and 2.12 percent net on average. Where the reward pot comes from, why 170 ADA in pool costs take almost half the yield at small pools, and when the first credit arrives.
Solana staking at 4.96 percent after commission: how to proceed
The yield follows from 3.59 percent issuance and a staking rate of 68.7 percent: 5.22 percent gross, and after the usual commission of 5 percent still 4.96 percent. Plus 665 validators, 63 of them charging full commission, and an epoch of a good 25 hours.
Crypto Staking – The DEFINITE Guide on How to MAKE money staking
If you want to know how to make money with cryptos, this is your complete guide to staking on Binance & earn passive income. What is Staking?
Which is Better: Proof of Work or Proof of Stake (PoW vs PoS)?
Let's take a look at what proof-of-work and proof-of-stake are, and discuss the positives and the negatives. Which is better: PoW vs PoS?
What is Proof of Stake?
The proof of stake method is drawing a lot of recognition these days, with Ethereum shifting over to this method from the proof of work method.
Cryptocurrency Staking : Tezos Leads With $1.38B Locked, EOS Second
CryptoDiffer released a report based on data from Staking Rewards on Apr 24, detailing the crypto-assets employing Proof of Stake (POS) consensus mechanism and their ranking, based on the percentage of the circulating supply and the resultant USD value of […]
Solana price prediction: the network creates 62,415 new SOL every day
Analysis: the Solana network issues 62,415 new SOL a day, regardless of where the price goes. We pulled the figure from the blockchain ourselves on Saturday and set it against trading volume, the staking ratio and the day's key levels.
ECB holds rates at 2.50 percent as Lagarde announces her exit
The ECB Governing Council leaves its key rates unchanged: the deposit facility stays at 2.50 percent, even though inflation in the euro area stands at 3.8 percent. On the same day Christine Lagarde announces her departure for February 7, 2027.
Cardano: 91.5 percent of the spending cap is committed, 42.6 million ADA remain
Of the 500 million ADA Cardano may spend in the current budget period, 457.4 million are committed through approved payouts. A single proposal for 22 million ADA is still up for a vote, and it lapses in mid-November.
Cardano Breaks Its 2021 Transaction Record: 1.78 Million in Five Days, Vote Lapsed
Cardano processed 1,780,896 transactions between 6 and 11 October, more than in any epoch before it. The vote on the 75 ADA minimum fee has meanwhile lapsed, and the ADA price is giving up around 5.3 percent.
Dogecoin Price at $0.087: 13.55 Million New DOGE Enter Circulation Every Day
Dogecoin trades at $0.087 and has lost 8.1 percent in seven days. Every day 13.55 million new coins come into existence, and unlike with Ethereum there is no compensation for holders.
Dogecoin price at $0.0948, no native staking in the protocol: what to watch on DOGE yield offers
Dogecoin was quoted at 0.084357 euros on Tuesday morning. Holders looking for a yield on their balance run into offers with the word staking in the name. The Dogecoin chain has no staking at all, and every one of those yields is a lending transaction with its own rules on liability and tax.
Cardano Jumps 11 Percent: What ADA Holders Should Check Before the Treasury Vote on October 11
ADA rose 10.8 percent on September 18, and several market reports name an ongoing vote on the Cardano treasury as the reason. Our own on-chain analysis shows that this proposal stands at 2.14 percent approval, and explains what holders can check before the deadline on October 11.
Animoca Token Is LIVE: How To Buy MOCA On Bitget?
Here is how the new MOCA token, launched by Animoca Brands and Moca Network is set to revolutionize the Web3 landscape with its unique utilities.
Top 10 Crypto Assets by Staking Market Cap
This article is all about the top 10 crypto assets by staking market cap. Let's take a look at it in more detail.
Ethereum Proof-of-Stake Merge Countdown! What is Ethereum Merge? : The Ultimate Guide
In this article, we’re going to talk about what is the Ethereum Proof-of-Stake Merge, the countdown, and other necessary details.
What is Cardano Staking? Here’s a Guide to Earning JUICY INTEREST!
Cardano is a project that gained many loyal followers over time. Cardano staking is an interesting aspect of the project, let's talk about it.
ConsenSys Ethereum 2.0 Staking Survey – 65% ETH Holders Plan To Stake
A report about the survey done by ConsenSys to determine various information about the Ethereum 2.0 staking from ETH holders.
NEAR Price at $4.93 After the 16 Percent Day: Is It Still Worth Getting In?
NEAR Protocol gains 8.6 percent to $4.93, a day after a 16.37 percent slump. Over 30 days the price is up 97.5 percent, over 14 days down 0.9 percent: our count shows what that means for an entry today.
28 Days Locked for 2.77 Percent a Year: What Polkadot Staking Means for Your DOT
Polkadot pays 2.77 percent a year for staking, and the exit takes 28 days. We weigh the two against each other: what is left after the validator's commission, how many DOT you need to start, and what the lock-up costs at this price.
Ethereum pays 2.66 percent, just over 2.2 arrives: what investors need to know about staking
The Ethereum network pays out around 2.66 percent a year, and just over 2.2 percent arrives through Lido and Rocket Pool. Where the gap comes from, how long the exit takes and what applies for tax in Germany.
NEAR ETF NRR is approved: what you have to check in Germany instead
The SEC made the registration of the Bitwise NEAR ETF effective on September 24, and NYSE Arca approved the listing under the ticker NRR. The prospectus rules out distribution outside the United States, so these are the routes left to you in Germany.
NEAR drops 7.6 percent as chip stocks drag the Nasdaq: can $4.83 hold?
NEAR Protocol has lost 7.57 percent in 24 hours to $4.91, more than twice as much as Bitcoin. The slide was triggered by the sell-off in technology and chip stocks on Wall Street, not by news out of the NEAR blockchain.
Ethereum staking pays 2.21 percent while the ECB pays 2.50
Ethereum's staking yield of 2.21 percent sits below the European Central Bank's deposit rate of 2.50 percent. What that gap means for the price, for the levels at $2,364 and $2,438 and for your tax return.
MyNearWallet Closes on October 31: What It Means for Your NEAR Coins
MyNearWallet shuts down on October 31, 2026, and its feature set starts shrinking in October. Your NEAR stay onchain, but browser access falls away: what to know about migration, the staking unbonding period, phishing and the holding period.